A day conference on New Testament historical apologetics affirms the reliability of the New Testament using new lines of evidence.

Considering the question of whether belief in God lacks the evidence to support it - and why arguments on their own are not enough.

The way the Gospel accounts use the right names for people shows that they were about real people, based on reliable information.

The way the Gospel accounts use correct place names shows that they were based on reliable information from first hand testimony.

This video describes the discovery of the earliest copy of part of John's Gospel, the 'John Rylands Fragment'.

Were the Gospel accounts corrupted as they were passed on? Was there any way to prevent this happening?

Adrian Holloway tackles the question of whether we can trust what we read in the New Testament or should dismiss it as unsubstantiated myth.

Did the early Christian communities apply Jesus's teaching to the problems they faced or alter the facts to fit their agendas?

How big are the differences between the hand-written copies of the Gospels' accounts of Jesus? Do these undermine what we can know about…