
Bible and Church Conference: the reliability of the NT
A day conference on New Testament historical apologetics affirms the reliability of the New Testament using new lines of evidence.
Related resources for The Qur’an vs the Bible
A day conference on New Testament historical apologetics affirms the reliability of the New Testament using new lines of evidence.
Bart Ehrman and Pete Williams debate the trustworthiness of the New Testament documents on Justin Brierley's 'Unbelievable?' radio…
This seminar on outreach to Muslims was given in the context of University evangelism, but its principles and advice are useful for a…
In the book The Da Vinci Code the author Dan Brown poses a question and suggests an answer, in a discussion between the characters of…
A review of Michael Licona's attempt to explain differences in the Gospel narratives by looking at the work of Plutarch.
Some reflections on why the canonical Gospels are in the Bible whereas the apocryphal Gospels are not.
Considering the question of whether belief in God lacks the evidence to support it - and why arguments on their own are not enough.
Why the case for the truth of Christianity has never been stronger - but Europe is a difficult place to spread that message.
Adrian Holloway tackles the question of whether we can trust what we read in the New Testament or should dismiss it as unsubstantiated myth.