The way the Gospel accounts use the right names for people shows that they were about real people, based on reliable information.

Were the Gospel accounts corrupted as they were passed on? Was there any way to prevent this happening?

How many hand-written copies of the Gospel accounts are there? What does this reveal about possible mistakes?

This video describes the discovery of the earliest copy of part of John's Gospel, the 'John Rylands Fragment'.

Are the Gospels full of contradictions? What would have been seen as normal standards of trustworthy historical writing at that time?

Did the early Christian communities apply Jesus's teaching to the problems they faced or alter the facts to fit their agendas?

The way the Gospel accounts use correct place names shows that they were based on reliable information from first hand testimony.

What does the oldest fragment of the New Testament tell us?